Fighting permits hurts economic development in area
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

by Kay Nelson | Thursday, March 13, 2008 | (2 comment(s))

In recent months, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management gave public notice or issued three significant environmental permits affecting Northwest Indiana. With each permit public comment process, many Indiana and Illinois stakeholders voiced their opposition to the issuance of the permits.

The opposition has been generated in part by inaccurate and inflammatory media coverage, the misunderstanding of the project details and the related environmental permitting process.

It is important to note that IDEM has prepared legally, scientifically and technically sound permits in each instance. The volumes of state and federal rules, regulations, laws and policies specify the intense process that must be followed when IDEM, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or other regulatory agencies draft new, modified or renewed environmental permits for air, water or solid waste disposal. When a draft permit is issued, the limitations and requirements contained within the permit reflect these rules, laws and policies. At no time is an environmental permit ever issued that does not uphold the intent of the law to protect human health and the environment.

When a corporation or municipality considers a major capital improvement project, the development team of environmental, legal, financial and other appropriate staff, reviews all project aspects. Critical to the decision-making process is the timeline for obtaining all legally required permits, which will dictate when construction is allowed to begin as well as when operations can commence. As such, the development team relies upon the reams of regulatory information as set forth in law to assist them in determining the timeline of the project.

The recent reaction to the issuance of draft environmental permits has attempted to seek commitments beyond compliance of current law without any legal, scientific or technical basis and has adversely affected the opportunity for significant capital investment in Northwest Indiana. In doing so, the message sent to corporate planners is one of uncertainty in obtaining quality permits in a timely fashion. This type of message forces these planners to look at other locations, not Northwest Indiana. Once a permit is issued in draft form, years have passed -- not days as has been inferred in public comments published to date.

Northwest Indiana, as well as the state, actively encourages businesses to consider us for their capital improvement projects at existing sites or to build new enterprises here. Each individual project brings new jobs, secures existing jobs and creates new support business opportunities.

Such projects add to the quality of life of Northwest Indiana residents.

No corporation or municipality proposes a project that would negatively impact the area and its residents. It is in their best interest to design a project that offers the economic opportunities in conjunction with environmental protection.

If Indiana is seen as a state that cannot offer the certainty of obtaining quality environmental permits in a legally defined timely fashion, we will lose opportunities to grow. We won't be considered for expansion or new locations by corporations. That perception would be detrimental in light of the indisputable fact that our environment has significantly improved over the last 30 to 40 years and continues to improve across the entire region.

Kay Nelson is director of environmental affairs for the Northwest Indiana Forum. The opinion expressed in this column is the writer's and not necessarily that of The Times.

Previous
Email
Print
 

Back to story 2 comment(s)

Please note: Comments from readers will be screened and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment perhaps:

  • It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
  • It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
  • It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
  • It promoted violence or illegal acts.
  • It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.

In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.

Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.

Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.

If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.

For more information please read our Terms of Service.

clean air wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:53 AM:

" if you are truly from this area you've seen an improvement in air quality that is the result of industry working to improve the air quality because unless you ride a bike and exist totally on solar power you're part of the problem cuz using energy be it gas or electricity results in some level of pollution. ain't nothing free!!! "

Dirty Air!! wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:22 AM:

" So what we can breathe in more toxins? "

Post a comment Once your comments are approved, they will appear here.

Current Word Count:
   

Marketplace