Red light cameras overexpose city
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

BY SUSAN BROWN
sbrown@nwitimes.com
219.836.3780
| Sunday, June 08, 2008 | (2 comment(s))

HAMMOND | City leaders last week entered the murky world Indiana lawmakers have faced for years on the question of the legality of red light cameras.

The Hammond City Council on Monday voted 7-2 in favor of installing the cameras at six city intersections. The ordinance next requires the signature of Mayor Thomas McDermott Jr.

If signed, Hammond will become the first community in the state to authorize using red light cameras though the General Assembly has a history of wrestling with the issue.

"There's a lot of controversy," said state Sen. Frank Mrvan Jr., D-Hammond, citing privacy issues as a particular rub. "It's a real tricky situation. There's more than one way this will be challenged. They should prepare themselves for litigation."

Mrvan said after years of the House shooting down any attempt to legislate the issue, resolutions from both the House and the Senate have assigned the question to this summer's study committee.

Six years ago, Fort Wayne, the state's second largest city, came close to being the first community in the state to authorize the cameras, which capture license plate numbers of cars caught running red lights.

As did Hammond, Fort Wayne limited the cameras to local streets, avoiding state and federal highways where they may not be installed under state law, and aimed to treat the citations as parking tickets.

But after considerable time and effort, city leaders, believing they needed a change in state law, decided to take a wait-and-see stance after testifying in 2002 at a Senate subcommittee. The bill later died, city spokeswoman Rachel Blakeman said last week.

City Engineer David Ross said Fort Wayne officials also had concerns about the accuracy of the outside vendor it was considering and whether the traffic lights would be changed to ease fining people.

In addition, the city was confronted with its attorneys saying the law required the citations to go through court as moving violations. City Council members reportedly don't want to subject motorists to penalties associated with moving violations, which include court costs and points against the driver's license.

Under the ordinance passed in Hammond last week, violations will be treated as parking tickets unless contested, at which point they enter the court system as moving violations, increasing the $100 fine to $211 and incurring driving points.

Processing tickets is a common stumbling block, according to Ann Sweet, a Warsaw woman who entered the fray in 1997 after her 21-year-old daughter, Shawnee, was killed by a trucker who ran a red light.

Sweet is a founder of the National Campaign to Stop Red Light Running and is the national survivor spokeswoman for the organization. "Our biggest thrust is education and getting legislation passed," she said. "Nothing is a perfect solution, but photo enforcement is a better solution than any other I know of."

Legislation regarding the use of red light cameras as a remedy varies nationwide, resulting in class action lawsuits and constitutional challenges. Two states, New Jersey and Wisconsin, have prohibited their use under any circumstances, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Gary Assistant City Attorney Carl Jones said his city's interest in red light cameras is on hold because it has questions regarding their legality.

Within the last 30 days, the city has contacted the office of state Sen. Earline Rogers to ask the Indiana attorney general's office to render an opinion before it tries to create a local ordinance, Jones said.

Staci Schneider, spokeswoman for Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter, said no inquiry or request was received from Hammond.

Previous Next
Email
Print
 

Back to story 2 comment(s)

Please note: Comments from readers will be screened and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment perhaps:

  • It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
  • It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
  • It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
  • It promoted violence or illegal acts.
  • It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.

In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.

Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.

Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.

If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.

For more information please read our Terms of Service.

bill wrote on Jun 8, 2008 12:02 PM:

" I sure hope when they do this they also fix the sensors in the streets too many times when on my motorcycle I have had no choice but to blow a red light because the sensors to not pick up a motorcycle and one could end up sitting at the intersection way way too long if your going to go high tech fix this issue also "

RR wrote on Jun 8, 2008 11:53 AM:

" What would be the difference between a red light camera or a police officer standing at the corner? So, when I’m stopped for running the red and I do not contest the officer; will I just get a parking ticket. A moving violation is a moving violation. Why make laws; if at a later date someone wants it bent to make it easier for them. "

Post a comment Once your comments are approved, they will appear here.

Current Word Count:
   

Marketplace