- Font Size:
- Default font size
- Larger font size
BY JOHN FLESHER
AP Environmental Writer | Monday, June 30, 2008 | (1 comment(s))
TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. | A year ago, it seemed a proposed compact designed to prevent raids on the Great Lakes might be sunk by squabbles in the states with jurisdiction over nearly one-fifth of the world's fresh surface water.
Now the deal is close to ratification on the state level, and supporters are beginning to plot strategy for the final step: winning approval from Congress and the White House.
On the surface, the task would appear easy. Congress has endorsed more than 200 interstate compacts over the years, including 41 dealing specifically with water management. They regulate use of some of the nation's primary water sources, such as the Colorado and Delaware rivers.
Leading supporters of the Great Lakes pact say they're aware of no significant opposition in Congress or from the Bush administration. Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama, the likely presidential nominees, have endorsed it.
But backers remain wary. After all, it was fear of water grabs from other sections of the country -- or even from overseas -- that inspired the eight states to negotiate their deal.
"There's a sense of urgency because this is an increasingly valuable natural resource at a time when significant growth is taking place in water-short areas," said David Naftzger, executive director of the Council of Great Lakes Governors.
The governors were jolted into action a decade ago when a Canadian firm obtained a permit from Ontario to ship tankers of Lake Superior water to Asia. The company dropped its plan in the face of withering criticism. But legal experts said the lakes needed stronger protection.
After years of haggling, the governors signed the compact in December 2005. They couldn't make a binding agreement with Ontario and Quebec, but both provinces adopted laws nearly identical to the compact.
It would prohibit, with rare exceptions, piping or shipping Great Lakes water outside the system's vast drainage basin, which reaches from the mouth of the St. Lawrence River to beyond the western edge of Lake Superior near Duluth, Minn. The basin measures about 900 miles east to west and 700 miles north to south.
Also, the states would be required to adopt conservation plans and regulate their use of water -- not just from the Great Lakes, but also inland waterways.
"It was declared dead several times before the governors came out with their recommendation," said Andy Buchsbaum, director of the National Wildlife Federation's Great Lakes Natural Resource Center. "It's been declared dead every couple of months since then. But it keeps coming back, like a cat with nine lives."
Associated Press writer Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.
Giving support
Approval is needed from the region's eight state legislatures. Minnesota quickly said yes, followed by Illinois, Indiana and New York.
Gov. Ted Strickland, of Ohio, signed the bill Friday and Jennifer Granholm, of Michigan, has pledged to sign her state's bill. When she does, the focus will turn to Pennsylvania, where the compact cleared the House in January and is pending in the Senate.
Back to story 1 comment(s)
- It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
- It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
- It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
- It promoted violence or illegal acts.
- It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.
In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.
For more information please read our Terms of Service.
Ol Timer wrote on Jun 30, 2008 5:56 AM: