EDITORIAL: Great Lakes Compact debate is switching to the federal level

Font Size:

| Tuesday, July 01, 2008 | (2 comment(s))

Now that nearly all the Great Lakes states have approved the Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Compact, it's time for Congress and the president to prepare to approve this agreement.

This treaty between the United States and Canada was approved by the Indiana General Assembly this year. It would establish important protections for the lakes that contain nearly one-fifth of the world's fresh surface water.

Lake Michigan is the source of drinking water for much of the region as well as a popular destination for boating and swimming. It is a giant lake, with an average depth of 279 feet.

Living in its shadow, the lake can easily be taken for granted. But elsewhere in the world -- even elsewhere in the nation -- long-term droughts make residents of those areas look longingly at the Great Lakes.

The Great Lakes Compact is essential in order to protect that water from being diverted elsewhere. Under the terms of the agreement, all of the states and provinces within the Great Lakes basin would have to approve any new diversion of water from the lakes.

States also would be required to adopt conservation plans and regulate their use of water from the Great Lakes and inland waterways.

U.S. Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain have both publicly supported the Great Lakes Compact. Congress must also support it.

Lake Michigan is our region's greatest natural resource. It is vital that the Great Lakes be protected through this treaty.

Your opinion, please
Are there any circumstances under which water from the Great Lakes should be diverted elsewhere?
Share your thoughts at http://nwi.com/opinion

Back to story 2 comment(s)

Please note: Comments from readers will be screened and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment perhaps:

It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
It promoted violence or illegal acts.
It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.

In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.

Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.

Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.

If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.

For more information please read our Terms of Service.

My My Oh Heck Yes wrote on Jul 1, 2008 8:33 PM:

" And while we're talking about our Canadian friends, let us wish them happy birthday. "

My My Oh Heck Yes wrote on Jul 1, 2008 8:31 PM:

" Without a doubt the Great Lakes belong to the people of the midwest. In particular, they belong to the people whose states and provinces border these freshwater inland seas. Imagine if we started to tear down the Rocky Mountains because we needed the dirt. What do you think the folks in Aspen or Telluride, or Jackson Hole, would say? "

Back to story 2 comment(s)

Post a comment Once your comments are approved, they will appear here.

Marketplace

Sections

Services

Other Publications

Search