- Font Size:
- Default font size
- Larger font size
BY SUSAN BROWN
sbrown@nwitimes.com
219.836.3780 | Tuesday, November 18, 2008 | (8 comment(s))
HAMMOND | With the clock ticking toward the Dec. 1 deadline for submitting its heavily amended budget to the state, the City Council on Monday threw cold water on Mayor Thomas McDermott Jr.'s latest attempt to raise Fire Chief Dave Hamm's salary to achieve parity with Police Chief Brian Miller.
In August, McDermott's proposed 2009 budget had Hamm jumping from his annual pay of $70,000 to $82,400, but the council later nixed the request, bumping Hamm to $72,100.
In recent weeks, the budget as passed in late September has undergone an overhaul to correct errors and omissions approved in error.
Among the changes was adding contractual parity requirements established in both departments' collective bargaining agreements.
On Monday, McDermott argued against a motion by Councilman at Large Robert Markovich to delete mention of the parity clause. The inclusion would have ensured Hamm reached parity with Miller.
McDermott argued the council risked a lawsuit for violating the firefighters' contract requirements, but the council ultimately rejected approving the amended budget until the dispute over the parity clause was resolved.
Unless the council met in special session prior to Dec. 1, voting down the amended budget on Monday put the budget at risk of going to the state at the amount approved in September.
Repay said the issue was fairness, and the council had agreed to only 3 percent raises for everyone.
"Hopefully there can be some reconciliation between today and (Dec.) 1st," he said.
"If Dave Hamm wants to sue us, that's a chance we'll have to take," Councilwoman JoAnn Matonovich said.
In a flurry of eleventh-hour motions, the council ultimately approved the budget after deleting the parity clause, reducing Hamm's salary back to $72,100.
The next move belongs to the mayor, who could opt to veto the measure.
The issue first surfaced in February with the city floating an ordinance to achieve parity between the two chiefs. The council in effect rejected the measure at the time by not bringing the proposal to a vote.
Back to story 8 comment(s)
- It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
- It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
- It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
- It promoted violence or illegal acts.
- It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.
In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.
For more information please read our Terms of Service.
McDermott is a parody wrote on Nov 20, 2008 3:54 PM:
Can the Hamm wrote on Nov 18, 2008 8:35 PM:
to Bake Sale wrote on Nov 18, 2008 4:13 PM:
Darrel N. wrote on Nov 18, 2008 11:53 AM:
Bake Sale wrote on Nov 18, 2008 10:04 AM:
Dobie wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:26 AM:
Or better still eliminate both positions and give their seconds in command their titles and a small raise? "
Thought Hammond had wrote on Nov 18, 2008 7:56 AM:
Daniel Kmak wrote on Nov 18, 2008 4:58 AM: