Council rejects election changes
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

BY BOB KASARDA
bkasarda@nwitimes.com
219.548.4345
| Tuesday, November 18, 2008 | (5 comment(s))

VALPARAISO | Porter County Clerk Pam Fish found herself at odds Monday with the other two members of the county election board over a proposal to revamp local election positions.

Fish argued the changes are needed to comply with state law.

But after hearing a contrary opinion from an attorney on the election board, the County Council rejected the proposed changes and opted instead to grant larger than typical raises of $5,000 each to Kathy Kozuszek and Sundae Kubacki, the Democrat and Republican representatives in the county voter registration office.

"You put on one heck of a show," Council Member Karen Conover said, lauding the women for their handling of this month's busy elections.

What Fish proposed was to take two of the four employees from the voter registration office and place them under the control of the election board along with two new employees. This group would be charged with administering elections, she said.

The two remaining full-time employees at the voter registration office, which has traditionally been charged with running the elections, would focus exclusively on registration issues, Fish said.

State law calls for this arrangement from any county with a population of more than 125,000, Fish said. Porter County has about 160,000 residents.

Fellow Democratic election board member and attorney J.J. Stankiewicz, however, told the council neither he nor board attorney Clay Patton agree the changes are mandated for the county.

Stankiewicz, who said he was blind-sided by the proposal, said the election officials need to step back and take look at what needs to be done to update the county's election process. The three election board members were invited to come back after the start of the year with a proposal agreed to by all.

Fish argued the extra help was needed to process votes after elections and redraw boundaries for 26 precincts that have exceeded the optimal limit of 1,200 voters each. The county also is likely to be called on next year to host a referendum for a $34 million high school renovation and addition project proposed by Porter Township schools, she said.

School Superintendent Nick Brown said earlier in the day he hopes to avoid the referendum and instead, complete the project within budget.

Next
Email
Print
 

Back to story 5 comment(s)

Please note: Comments from readers will be screened and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment perhaps:

  • It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
  • It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
  • It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
  • It promoted violence or illegal acts.
  • It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.

In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.

Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.

Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.

If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.

For more information please read our Terms of Service.

Porter Twp parent wrote on Nov 18, 2008 8:51 PM:

" Excuse me, Mr. Here We Go, Only Whitten has a child in the Porter Twp schools. Ms. Knoblock has come out against the project. Graham is not even a resident of Porter Twp. But even more importantly, none of the people you mentioned have a single thing to do with how a school corp spends money. You should consider brushing up on what exactly the Porter County Council and Commissioners do before you talk out of turn. Sheesh... "

PC Resident wrote on Nov 18, 2008 8:43 PM:

" When is the last time anything was completed within budget? "

Wet Hen wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:39 AM:

" A BIG raise and then the opportunity to hire a couple of cousins. What a deal! "

Here we go wrote on Nov 18, 2008 6:24 AM:

" Not even 3 weeks pass and now we are talking about the county paying the bill for a referendum to approve a new school in Porter Twp?
Lets see, Knoblock, Whitten,Bucko,Blaney and Graham are all from Porter Twp. Maybe they will want to move the Government Center there next as well. The people of PC pay for the referendum so they do not have to say no. What a deal. Lake County, we have arrived. THere is your change. I guess since Mitch lowered there taxes they have more money to spend. Wouldnt this be a tax increase? "

Pam Fish Blindsided wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:47 AM:

" Surprise Surprise she can't even run the clerks office. Hopefully the democrats will come up with a much more viable candidate next election!!! "

Post a comment Once your comments are approved, they will appear here.

Current Word Count:
   

Marketplace